SECTION III - SPORTS AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY / RESEARCH PAPER
Match Performance Analysis of Women’s Épée in the 2017–2019 World Fencing Championships
,
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
raduate Institute of Athletics and Coaching Science, National Taiwan Sport University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
 
 
Submission date: 2024-10-09
 
 
Final revision date: 2025-01-08
 
 
Acceptance date: 2025-03-27
 
 
Online publication date: 2025-09-23
 
 
Corresponding author
Yin-Hua Chen   

Graduate Institute of Athletics and Coaching Science, National Taiwan Sport University, No. 250, Wenhua 1st Rd., 33301, Taoyuan, Taiwan
 
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Épée preserves the original dueling nature of fencing and is the only discipline that allows double hits. However, there is still limited understanding of how specific techniques are used in different contexts, such as bout rounds, piste areas, and score statuses (leading, tied, or trailing). To address this gap, this study analyzed the performance of elite female épée fencers during the top 16 to final bouts of the 2017–2019 world championships using notational analysis of videos from the International Fencing Federation’s official YouTube channel. This dataset included 1,840 scoring events across 45 matches, involving 38 fencers. Three- or two-way mixed-design ANOVAs, as well as two-way repeated measures ANOVAs were conducted to investigate the effects of these factors and their interactions for both winners and losers. Results highlighted the second round as a crucial scoring phase. Winners strategically focused on achieving more single hits (than double hits), attacking in the first two rounds and counterattacking in the third. When leading, winners often lured their opponent toward their side of the piste to maintain control, while becoming more aggressive—advancing into the central or even the middle area of the opponent’s side to score with attacks—when temporarily tied or trailing. In contrast, losers frequently scored in the central and middle areas of both sides. When temporarily leading, they displayed no clear preference for specific techniques or areas of the piste. These findings provide valuable insights for coaches to design more effective training sessions and offer targeted feedback during competitions to enhance fencers’ performance.
REFERENCES (20)
1.
Altman, D. G. (1990). Practical statistics for medical research. CRC Press.
 
2.
Aquili, A., Tancredi, V., Triossi, T., De Sanctis, D., Padua, E., D'Arcangelo, G., & Melchiorri, G. (2013). Performance analysis in saber.  Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 27(3), 624–630.
 
3.
Bottoms, L. (2011). Physiological responses and energy expenditure to simulated epee fencing in elite female fencers. Serbian Journal of Sports Sciences, 5(1), 17–20.
 
4.
Chow, J. Y. (2013). Nonlinear learning underpinning pedagogy: evidence, challenges, and implications. Quest, 65(4), 469–484.
 
5.
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46.
 
6.
Fédération Internationale d'Escrime. (2023). FIE material rules. Lausanne: FIE Executive Committee. https://static.fie.org/uploads...; accessed on 1 October 2024.
 
7.
Fédération Internationale d'Escrime. (2023). Organization rules. Lausanne: FIE Executive Committee. https://static.fie.org/uploads...; accessed on 1 October 2024.
 
8.
Fédération Internationale d'Escrime. (2023). FIE Technical rules. Lausanne: FIE Executive Committee. https://static.fie.org/uploads...; accessed on 1 October 2024.
 
9.
Hughes, M., & Franks, I. (2007). The essentials of performance analysis: an introduction. Routledge.
 
10.
Newell, K. M. (1986). Constraints on the development of coordination. In M. G. Wade & H. T. A. Whiting (Eds.), Motor development in children: Aspects of coordination and control (pp. 341–360). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
 
11.
Oates, L. W., Campbell, I. G., Iglesias, X., Price, M. J., Muniz-Pumares, D., & Bottoms, L. M. (2019). The physiological demands of elite epée fencers during competition. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 19(1), 76–89.
 
12.
O'Donoghue, P. (2014). An introduction to performance analysis of sport. Routledge.
 
13.
Renshaw, I., & Chow, J. Y. (2019). A constraint-led approach to sport and physical education pedagogy. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 24(2), 103–116.
 
14.
Roi, G.S. & Pittaluga, I. (1997). Time-motion analysis in women’s sword fencing. Proceedings of the 4th IOC Congress on Sport Sciences, Oct 22–25. Monaco: 66, 22–25.
 
15.
Roi, G. S. & Bianchedi, D. (2008). The science of fencing: implications for performance and injury prevention. Sports Medicine, 38, 465–481.
 
16.
Tarragó, R., Bottoms, L., & Iglesias, X. (2023). Temporal demands of elite fencing. Plos One, 18(6), e0285033.
 
17.
Turner, A., James, N., Dimitriou, L., Greenhalgh, A., Moody, J., Fulcher, D., ... & Kilduff, L. (2014). Determinants of Olympic fencing performance and implications for strength and conditioning training. Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 28(10), 3001–3011.
 
18.
Wylde, J. M., Tan, F. H., & O’Donoghue, G. P. (2013). A time-motion analysis of elite women’s foil fencing. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 13(2), 365–376.
 
19.
Williams, L. R. T., & Walmsley, A. (2000). Response amendment in fencing: differences between elite and novice subjects. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 91(1), 131–142.
 
20.
Zadorozhna, O., Briskin, Y., Perederiy, A., Pityn, M., & Sydorko, O. (2018). Team composition in epee fencing which accounts for sportsmen's individual performance. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 18, 1863–1870.
 
eISSN:1899-7562
ISSN:1640-5544
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top