SECTION IV - PSYCHOLOGICAL AND SOCIOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF SPORT AND EXERCISE / RESEARCH PAPER
Interaction between Perceived Autonomy Support and Sports Engagement of Athletes: A Cross Lag Regression Analysis
1
Department of Sport and Health, Guangzhou Sport University, Guangzhou, China.
2
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Human Sports Performance Science, Guangzhou, China.
These authors had equal contribution to this work
Submission date: 2024-08-30
Final revision date: 2025-02-07
Acceptance date: 2025-03-17
Online publication date: 2025-09-23
Corresponding author
Zhou Yu
Department of Leisure and Digital Sports, Guangzhou Sport University, 广州市天河区, 510500, Guangzhou, China
Department of Leisure and Digital Sports, Guangzhou Sport University, 广州市天河区, 510500, Guangzhou, China
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
To examine the relationship between perceived autonomy support and sports engagement among athletes, this study conducted a 6-month follow-up with 79 provincial team athletes, assessed over three time periods. The results were analyzed using latent variable growth models and cross-lagged regression analysis. The findings indicated that: (1) both perceived autonomy support and sports engagement exhibited a linear decline across the three measurement periods; (2) perceived autonomy support significantly predicted subsequent sports engagement, and sports engagement, in turn, significantly predicted later perceived autonomy support. However, in terms of stability, perceived autonomy support was a more consistent predictor of sports engagement. In summary, these findings reveal the dynamic interaction between athletes' perceived autonomy support and sports engagement, highlighting the crucial role of coaches' autonomy support in shaping athletes' engagement, as well as the reciprocal influence of athletes' engagement on the coaching style.
REFERENCES (44)
1.
Adie, J., Duda, J., & Ntoumanis, N. (2008). Autonomy support, basic need satisfaction and the optimal functioning of adult male and female sport participants: A test of basic needs theory. Motivation and Emotion, 3, 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031....
2.
Appleton, P. R., Ntoumanis, N., Quested, E., Viladrich, C., & Duda, J. L. (2016). Initial validation of the coach-created Empowering and Disempowering Motivational Climate Questionnaire. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 22, 53–65.
3.
Bandalos, D. L. (2014). Relative performance of categorical diagonally weighted least squares and robust maximum likelihood estimation. Structural Equation Modeling, 21(1), 102–116.
4.
Balk, Y. A., de Jonge, J., Geurts, S. A., & Oerlemans, W. G. (2019). Antecedents and consequences of perceived autonomy support in elite sport: A diary study linking coaches’ off-job recovery and athletes’ performance satisfaction. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 44, 26–34.
5.
Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 164–180. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x.
6.
Bartholomew, K.J., Ntoumanis, N., Ryan, R.M., & Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C. (2011). Psychological need thwarting in experience. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 33, 75–102. doi:10.1123/jsep.33.1.75.
7.
Bormann, K. C., Schulte-Coerne, P., Diebig, M., & Rowold, J. (2016). Athlete characteristics and team competitive performance as moderators for the relationship between coach transformational leadership and athlete performance. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 38(3), 268–281. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2....
8.
Cohen, J. (1988). Set correlation and contingency tables. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12(4), 425–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662....
9.
Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., Lee, J., & Lee, Y. (2015). Giving and receiving autonomy support in a high-stakes sport context: A field-based experiment during the 2012 London Paralympic Games. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 19, 59–69.
10.
Cronin, L. D., Arthur, C. A., Hardy, J., & Callow, N. (2015). Transformational leadership and task cohesion in sport: The mediating role of inside sacrifice. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 37(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2....
11.
Cunningham, G. B., & Dixon, M. A. (2003). New perspectives concerning performance appraisals of intercollegiate coaches. Quest, 55(2), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/003362....
12.
Curran, P. J., & Bollen, K. A. (2001). The best of both worlds: Combining autoregressive and latent curve models. In L. M. Collins & A. G. Sayer (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 107–135). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10409-....
13.
Curran, T., Hill, A. P., Hall, H. K., & Jowett, G. E. (2014). Perceived coach behaviors and athletes' engagement and disaffection in youth sport: the mediating role of the psychological needs. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 45(6), 559–580.
14.
Curran, T., Hill, A. P., Hall, H. K., & Jowett, G. E. (2015). Relationships between the coach-created motivational climate and athlete engagement in youth sport. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 37(2), 193–198. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2....
15.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1980). Self-determination theory: When mind mediates behavior. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 1(1), 33–43. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43....
16.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6....
17.
De Stavola, B. L., Nitsch, D., dos Santos Silva, I., McCormack, V., Hardy, R., Mann, V., … & Leon, D. A. (2006). Statistical issues in life course epidemiology. American Journal of Epidemiology, 163(1), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kw....
18.
Dong, Y. R., & Peng, C.-Y. J. (2013). Principled missing data methods for researchers. Springerplus, 2(1), 1–17.
19.
Draugelis, S., Martin, J., & Garn, A. (2014). Psychosocial predictors of well-being in collegiate dancers. Sport Psychologist, 28(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.20....
20.
Haerens, L., Vansteenkiste, M., De Meester, A., Delrue, J., Tallir, I., Vande Broek, G., ... & Aelterman, N. (2018). Different combinations of perceived autonomy support and control: Identifying the most optimal motivating style. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 23(1), 16–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/174089....
21.
Hodge, K., Lonsdale, C., & Jackson, S. A. (2009). Athlete engagement in elite sport: An exploratory investigation of antecedents and consequences. Sport Psychologist, 23(2), 186–202.
22.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/107055....
23.
Huh, J.-Y., & Choi, H.-H. (2017). Effect of coach-athlete relationship maintenance on the relationship between coaching behaviors and team efficacy in professional soccer athletes [In Korean]. Korean Wellness Society, 12, 261–273. https://doi.org/10.21097/ksw.2....
24.
Li, W., Chen, A., Liu, Z., Guo, S., & Fu, W. (2022). Reciprocal effects of teacher autonomy support and student academic engagement in blended synchronous learning environment: A two-wave longitudinal study. International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET), 2022, 229–233. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISET55....
25.
Lonsdale, C., Hodge, K., & Jackson, S. A. (2007). Athlete engagement: II. Developmental and initial validation of the Athlete Engagement Questionnaire. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 38(4), 471–492.
26.
Lonsdale, C., Hodge, K., & Jackson, S. A. (2007). Athlete engagement: II. Development and initial validation of the athlete engagement questionnaire. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 38(4), 471–492.
27.
Mageau, G. A., & Vallerand, R. J. (2003). The coach–athlete relationship: A motivational model. Journal of Sports Sciences, 21, 883–904. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 0264041031000140374.
28.
Mascolo, M. F., & Fischer, K. W. (2015). Dynamic development of thinking, feeling, and acting. Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Theory and method, 113–161. https://doi.org/10.1002/978111....
29.
Ntoumanis, N., Barkoukis, V., Gucciardi, D. F., & Chan, D. K. C. (2017). Linking coach interpersonal style with athlete doping intentions and doping use: A prospective study. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 39(3), 188–198. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2....
30.
O’Neil, L., & Hodge, K. (2020). Commitment in sport: The role of coaching style and autonomous versus controlled motivation. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 32(6), 607–617. https://doi.org/10.1080/104132....
31.
Pakpahan, E., Hoffmann, R., & Kröger, H. (2017). Statistical methods for causal analysis in life course research: An illustration of a cross-lagged structural equation model, a latent growth model, and an autoregressive latent trajectories model. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(1), 1–19 https://doi.org/10.1080/136455....
32.
Reynders, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Van Puyenbroeck, S., Aelterman, N., De Backer, M., Delrue, J., De Muynck, GJ., Fransen, K., Haerens, L., Vande Broek, G. (2019). Coaching the coach: intervention effects on need-supportive coaching behavior and athlete motivation and engagement. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 43, 288–300.
33.
Preacher, K. J. (2015). Advances in mediation analysis: A survey and synthesis of new developments. Annual Review of Psychology, 66(1), 825–852. https://doi.org/10.1146/annure....
34.
Prusak, K. A., Treasure, D. C., Darst, P. W., & Pangrazi, R. P. (2004). The effects of choice on the motivation of adolescent girls in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 23(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2....
35.
Raabe, J., Schmidt, K., Carl, J., & Höner, O. (2019). The effectiveness of autonomy support interventions with physical education teachers and youth sport coaches: A systematic review. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 41(6), 345–355. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2....
36.
Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 579. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10....
37.
Reinboth, M., Duda, J., & Ntoumanis, N. (2004). Dimensions of coaching behavior, need satisfaction, and the psychological and physical welfare of young athletes. Motivation and Emotion, 29, 297–313. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MOEM....
38.
Rocchi, M., & Pelletier, L. G. (2017). The antecedents of coaches’ interpersonal behaviors: The role of the coaching context, coaches’ psychological needs, and coaches’ motivation. Journal of sport and exercise psychology, 39(5), 366–378. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2....
39.
Stebbings, J., Taylor, I. M., Spray, C. M., & Ntoumanis, N. (2012). Antecedents of perceived coach interpersonal behaviors: The coaching environment and coach psychological well-and ill-being. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 34(4), 481–502. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.3....
40.
Stebbings, J., Taylor, I. M., & Spray, C. M. (2016). Interpersonal mechanisms explaining the transfer of well-and ill-being in coach–athlete dyads. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 38(3), 292–304. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2....
41.
Vega-Díaz, M., & González-García, H. (2025). Do Parenting Styles Influence Mental Toughness and Sportsmanship in Young Athletes? A Structural Equation Modelling Approach. Journal of Human Kinetics, 95, 243–257. https://doi.org/10.5114/jhk/18....
42.
Wang, L., Meng, Q., & Lipowski, M. (2024). Effects of Emotional States on the Spatial Perception of Youth Athletes with Different Alerting Efficiencies. Journal of Human Kinetics, 94, 255–267. https://doi.org/10.5114/jhk/18....
43.
Wilson, P. M., Gregson, J. P., & Mack, D. E. (2009). The importance of interpersonal style in competitive sport: A self-determination theory approach. Handbook of Sport Psychology, ed CH Chang (Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science), 259–276.
44.
Yang, J., & Zhao, X. (2020). Parenting styles and children’s academic performance: Evidence from middle schools in China. Children and Youth Services Review, 113, 105017.
| eISSN: | 1899-7562 |
| ISSN: | 1640-5544 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
